Volume > Issue > The Problem of the Pastor's Dog

The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog

GUEST COLUMN

By Joseph L. Lennon | May 2007
The Rev. Joseph L. Lennon, O.P. is a former Vice President of Providence College in Rhode Island.

An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.

Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”

Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.

Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

Pros & Cons of Pentecostalism & Charismatic Catholicism

Having banished one strange tongue — Latin — the Catholic Church witnessed an odd phenomenon in the 1960s: an out­break of “unknown tongues” or glossolalia.

Nazarenes under the Scimitar

The only place in the Middle East where Christians face no restrictions on the practice of their faith is Israel, where they comprise two percent of the population.

Letter to the Editor: January-February 2018

The Real Extent of Creative Destruction... Far Beyond Lambeth... A Vacated Bridge?... Avenue of Appeals: Closed Until Further Notice... Prescience of the Vampire... The Kids Aren't Alright... Division You Will Always Have with You... The Beast Within Us... and more