The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog
GUEST COLUMN
An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.
Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”
Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.
Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).
You May Also Enjoy
Young women also are spiritually hungry for a sense of purpose and meaning in life, for something or someone to believe in, for moral direction.
Hungary: The Envy of Nations... A Small First Step... Ecclesial Weather Forecast... Changing Structures... Marginalized Pathologies... The Architectonic Paradigm for Thought & Action... The Limits of Satire... Not a Nutjob... From Criminalization to Medicalization... Praying With Prisoners
Has the Permanent Revolution Pooped Out In the People's Republic?... Oh, to Be a Victim!... Can We Please Change the Subject!... When the "Shorter Form" Is The Politically Correct Form... Evangelize! (But Why?)