The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog
GUEST COLUMN
An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.
Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”
Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.
Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).
You May Also Enjoy
The principle of subsidiarity, central to Catholic social thought, makes interesting contact with the associational tradition of American life as elaborated by Tocqueville.
Faking Diversity... Let Them Auction Cake... Chicken-Scratch Gaffe... A Bigger Slice of Pi... Electric Snake... dryPhone... and more
Stupid in Moral Matters... Does God Love Unrepentant Sinners... Is the Pope Above Criticism?... The Government Does Not Screw Things Up for the Super Rich... Co-operation in Evil... Can a Priest's Ordination Be Declared Invalid?... A Response from William Donohue...