Volume > Issue > The Problem of the Pastor's Dog

The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog

GUEST COLUMN

By Joseph L. Lennon | May 2007
The Rev. Joseph L. Lennon, O.P. is a former Vice President of Providence College in Rhode Island.

An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.

Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”

Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.

Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

Briefly: September 2009

Reviews of Light and Shadows: Church History Amid Faith, Fact, and Legend... Life of Christ... Saints of the Bible: Exploring Scrip­ture with Holy Men & Wom­en...

Clarifying the Disputed Witness of Franz Jaegerstaetter

Almost 35 years have passed since I had the privilege of “discovering” the story of…

Letters to the Editor: October 2024

A Bureaucracy Devouring Its Prey... Transformed by Educational Freedom... Whitewashed Hypocrisy... Faithful to the Spirit & Letter... and more