The Problem of the Pastor’s Dog
GUEST COLUMN
An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.
Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal “yes and no.”
Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.
Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest’s in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion — e.g., “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly” (Prov. 26:11) and “Do not give dogs what is holy” (Mt. 7:16).
You May Also Enjoy
Reviews of Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life... Reason in the Balance: The Case Against Naturalism in Science, Law, and Education... The Battle of Beginnings: Why Neither Side Is Winning the Creation-Evolution Debate
When love is encased in truth, it radiates peace and societies prosper. Without truth, love is a silk noose strangling the souls of men and squeezing the life from society.
Reviews of Man and Woman: Love and the Meaning of Intimacy... Islam and the West... Sephardim: The Jews from Spain... The Jews of Spain... Spain and the Jews... 1492: The Life and Times of Juan Cabezon of Castille... The Strength Not to Fight... Caring for Creation in Your Own Backyard... The Anatomy of Antiliberalism... A Historical Commentary on the Major Catholic Works of Cardinal Newman