Rash Judgment Once Again
As we said in our New Oxford Note “Hit Men for Opus Dei” (Jan. 2006): “If rash judgment is your thing, [Mark] Shea’s blog is just what you want.”
In late December 2005, we put up on our website the January 2006 NOR. If you are an online subscriber (for which you pay an extra $10), you are able to view the entire issue online — often before it arrives in your mailbox.
Each weekday we also have a rotating section with one item from the current issue, in which you can view part of an article or New Oxford Note for free. But to view the entire article or New Oxford Note online, you need to be an online subscriber, or if you’re not an online subscriber, you need to pay a mere $1.50 to read the entire piece.
As we all know, Mark Shea despises the NOR, but he just can’t resist going to our website. He found “Hit Men for Opus Dei,” which discusses his blog.
You May Also Enjoy
Michael Rose Is a Liar and a Vicious Bully... Michael Rose Responds... The Traditional Latin Mass — Pro and Con... The Dogs Are Barking...
The McCarrick report is a historical accounting that doesn’t hold anyone accountable, and it will have no practical consequences.
The Catechism — like the Ten Commandments and Jesus’ injunctions against lust — reduces ECUSA’s sexuality resolution to cinders.