The Unbuckled Bible Belt?
The popular image of Bible Belters is that of old-fashioned puritans who eschew frivolity for the straight and narrow. Apparently not — or not all that often anymore.
The June issue of Citizen magazine, published by evangelical James C. Dobson’s Focus on the Family, reports on a major study on divorce done by the Barna Research Group. The Citizen article states: “Baptists and nondenominational Protestant churches (which dominate the Bible Belt) included more adults who had been divorced (29 percent and 35 percent respectively) than any other Christian denomination…. Lutherans and Catholics had the lowest divorce rates at 21 percent.”
Citizen says the big reason for the Bible Belt’s poor showing is antinomianism, the view that “once we are justified by faith in Christ, we no longer have an obligation to the moral law,” that “we are not bound by the law, but rather led by the Holy Spirit….” Citizen goes so far as to call this a heresy.
Citizen also notes that Bible Belters are “very concerned about threats to the sanctity of marriage launched from homosexual activists who seek to turn the definition of marriage on its head,” but asks: “Are we ignoring an even more substantial threat to marriage [namely, divorce]?” In Citizen’s view, when sizable numbers of heterosexuals — especially Christians — in effect spurn the sanctity of marriage, they are “redefining” marriage, and then — why of course! — homosexuals will feel justified in redefining it a bit more, hence the pressure for “same-sex marriage.”
You May Also Enjoy
This year the garden patch I pass by daily lies deserted. For years I have…
Much popular Catholic literature on NFP is utilitarian, claiming that obeying Church teaching results in a happier, more exciting bedroom experience.
It is because of this intimate connection between the Eucharist and the remarried person’s prior marriage, that reception of the Eucharist must be refused.