Volume > Issue > A Personalist Vision

A Personalist Vision

A SOCIAL PERSPECTIVE BASED ON THE TRANSCENDENT DIGNITY OF THE HUMAN PERSON

By James G. Hanink | March 1989
James G. Hanink is Associate Editor of the NOR and Profes­sor of Philosophy at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles.

Are those of us gathered round the NOR personalists? It seems to me that we are — or ought to be — personalists, and that the NOR would do well to declare itself such. This journal’s Editor finds this suggestion of mine a “brave” one, given the NOR’s aversion to labels (see the Nov. 1987 editorial). In­deed, he invites a full discussion of this very propos­al.

There is, of course, no question that the NOR, in addition to being ecumenical in spirit, is also firm­ly Catholic. So the issue of personalism is one that we need to explore from the heart of the Church.

Broadly taken, personalism is a social vision based on the transcendent dignity of the human per­son. A rough statement of such a vision is easy enough: persons flourish only in community, and community exists only insofar as it reverences per­sons. There is no finer expression of the Church’s presence in the struggle for authentic community than Vatican II’s pledge:

The joys and hopes, the griefs and the anxieties of the men of this age, especial­ly those who are poor or in any way af­flicted, these too are the joys and hopes, the griefs and anxieties of the followers of Christ. Indeed, nothing genuinely hu­man fails to raise an echo in their hearts (Gaudium et Spes, No. 1).

Nearly 25 years after Vatican II, these words have become familiar to us.

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

Through a Crucible to Spring

After my attempts to contact Church officials had been rebuffed, I asked a lawyer to send a letter on his firm's official letterhead to my local bishop.

Holocausts

We Christians have let the world forget the suffering of fellow Christians and the suffering of aborted children.

On Shakespeare's Supposed Catholicity

What can we say, if anything, about the Bard's religious and political views and how, if at all, are they woven into the plays themselves?