A Critique of the Second Draft
CHRIST & NEIGHBOR
The second draft of the U.S. bishops’ pastoral letter on Catholic social teaching and the U.S. economy is on the whole a magnificent statement. I am especially grateful that the bishops held firm on the major points of the first draft, despite the critical barrage directed at them by Michael Novak and his band of merry capitalists.
Nevertheless, I think there are internal contradictions in the second draft that weaken it seriously. Two, to be exact, as follows:
(1) Again and again, and rightly so, the bishops emphasize the right to work, not in the perverted sense of a right to work in a nonunion shop, but the right of everyone to a decent job at decent pay. They also add the duty to work, a duty much ignored by a society in which the idle rich are more likely to be described as “the beautiful people.”
The bishops solidly document the failure of private industry to provide decent jobs and they conclude that “current levels of unemployment are morally unacceptable,” particularly so in the case of minorities (34 percent for black youth).
Again and again, and rightly so, the bishops emphasize the long-established and repeated principle of Catholic social teaching that the state must intervene when private industry is unable to provide fundamental human rights.
You May Also Enjoy
My name was placed on a hit list; I was accused of being a communist. At the same time we were leafleted by guerrillas, who were attacking our stand on nonviolence.
Gender ideologues are at work in the Church -- no surprise. That they occupy positions of power and speak with authority is, however, cause for great concern.
One function of the Catholic bishop is to insist upon the doctrinal integrity of the whole of the Church's teaching. Today's bishops have too often forgotten this.