A Time Out for Time Magazine
When Time magazine does a feature piece on the Catholic Church, don’t think for a minute, dear reader, that Time is on our side. Take, for example, David Van Biema’s article on the beatification of Pope Pius IX (Sept. 4): Whom should Van Biema marshal in his contrived debate on Pio Nono but none other than Garry Wills (of Papal Sin infamy) — this in an attempt to heap ridicule on one of the Church’s most steadfast defenders.
Van Biema paints, as best he can, Pio Nono as an out-of-control megalomaniac who invented the doctrine of Papal Infallibility in order to shut up his Modernist opponents. Taking Pio Nono out of his historical context, Van Biema derides his methods and character. In delivering the obligatory aspersions of anti-Semitism, Van Biema doesn’t seem to realize that the mission of the Church is to evangelize and that Jesus — who was not known for His soft hand — got it all started by evangelizing the Jews first. If that qualifies as anti-Semitism, then by Van Biema’s measure, the Messiah is a bigot and none of the Apostles would qualify for sainthood.
Van Biema’s polemic can be summed up in one quote: “He was truly pious. However, he was also…bullying.” Loosely translated: “Yeah, he was a goody-two-shoes, but sometimes he was really mean!” Come on, Van Biema, grow up! You’re not in kindergarten anymore and this isn’t a contest to see who gets to be kickball monitor. For your tantrum, you and your pouty, thumb-sucking friends deserve a time out.
You May Also Enjoy
Orthodoxy or Bankruptcy... Shut Up & Sit Down?... Talk Is Not Enough... Religion & Mental Health... A Slave Set Free... Miserable Failures... Coming: Another Dependable Catholic Encyclopedia... Schall's Wimpy Americanist Tendencies... Endo: Great Entertainer, Very Poor Theologian
Ed. Note: During the 1985-1986 academic year, Henri J.M. Nouwen was a priest-in-residence at the…
Spiritual directors, chaplains, spiritually minded medical doctors, and gifted lay people of the nineteenth century did a better job of caring for the emotionally and mentally ill than our modern mental-health "experts."