Volume > Issue > Catholic Street Teaching Revisited

Catholic Street Teaching Revisited

GUEST COLUMN

By Gerard Casey | October 1987
Gerard Casey is a professor of philosophy at The Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C.

Over a period of almost 50 years, in London, New York, Washington, D.C., and other cities in England, America, and Australia, men and women stood on street corners, in parks, and in other public places expounding the teachings of the Church to all who would listen. They were members of the Catholic Evidence Guild (founded in London in 1918, in New York in 1928), an organization dedicated to presenting the truths of the Catholic Faith to the man in the street. A typical C.E.G. outdoor meeting would consist of a succinct presentation on some specific aspect of the Catholic Faith followed by a period of free-wheeling question and answer. The presentation itself always comprised exposition and explanation, never polemic, preaching, or argument. The presenter, who had to undergo rigorous training before being allowed to speak in public, would answer all questions candidly, endeavoring to convey the teachings of the Church to an audience occasionally hostile to them, and almost always ignorant of them.

The accomplishments of the Guild are hard to gauge since no statistics were kept. But there were some spectacular successes. As Donald Ward recounts, “Once Frank Sheed was approached by a man who had heard him speak for the English Guild in Hyde Park 20 years before and had become a Catholic as a result. One man who had been a fierce heckler at Guild meetings is now an abbot. Another has become a vicar-general.”

At present the C.E.G. is practically moribund. The New York Guild has suspended its activities indefinitely and the Washington Guild no longer operates. How could an organization, which could field 600 trained speakers in England alone, atrophy to such a degree? In an interview with The Catholic Digest in December 1981, Frank Sheed claimed that the most serious cause of the Guild’s decline was a growing confusion about what the Church taught.

When nobody knew any longer what the Church taught, nobody felt called upon to go out and tell people what the Church taught. Those of us who had been trained before this came in could still go out and get the same sort of crowd. But the people who hadn’t been formed before this explosion felt no desire to go out and teach.

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

Briefly: November 1989

Review of Diary 1964/65... Butler's Lives of the Saints: Complete Edition... Be Reconciled to God: A Family Guide to Confession... El Infierno... Dictionary of Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements... The Adams-Jefferson Letters: The Complete Correspond­ence between Thomas Jeffer­son and Abigail and John Adams... The Woman of the Pharisees

What Yad Vashem Reveals About the Jewish Sense of History

To honor Pius XII would be to honor the Catholic Church. Doing so would render nonsensical the placement of the Church among the Complicit.

Understanding the All-Male Priesthood

The Church holds that the priest, standing in persona Christi, cannot supply the right sacramental material without being male, since Christ Himself was male.