Volume > Issue > Confessions of a Lapsed Evolutionist

Confessions of a Lapsed Evolutionist

INTELLECTUAL DIFFICULTIES

By S.L. Varnado | September 1983
S.L. Varnado is Professor of English at the University of South Alabama in Mobile, and a Contributing Editor of the NOR.

There was a time, some years ago, when I was a firm believer in the theory of evolution, that ap­pealing doctrine revealed by Darwin, preached by Huxley, and handed down by apostolic succession to the present generation. I was quite content with the theory of evolution, for there is something in­finitely consoling about the doctrine. The evolutionist goes to the zoo, gazes at the monkeys, ac­knowledges his kinship with them, yet prides him­self on his superiority. Thus, evolution combines the satisfactions of democracy with the advantages of aristocracy.

Unfortunately, as the years have passed, I have grown skeptical in regard to this ancient faith and I am now a virtual agnostic. When I was young and innocent, I could take evolution on faith alone. As I grew older, however, and became a Christian, I began to demand facts. That is one difficulty in studying theology: the science of religion tends to weaken one’s faith in the religion of science.

The history of my lapsed faith in evolution goes back to my college days. The college I attend­ed was a denominational institution and a model of liberal or “enlightened” religion. The professors all believed in God, but they saw Him as a more or less cautious and scientific deity who used Darwin­ian natural selection His wonders to perform.

My biology professor, for instance, was a Higher Pantheist. He was a large, rubicund man with a loud voice and an optimistic view of the uni­verse. The geological ages cheered him up immense­ly. If he came to class in a low mood you could en­courage him by mentioning the Silurian, Devonian, or even the Cambrian periods.

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

“Scientific” Literalism

Review of Creation Rediscovered: Evolution and the Importance of the Origins Debate

Darwinian Departures from Reality

Enlightenment thought in the 19th century accepted that Progress was such a powerful force that it would transform human nature. Darwin was swept along by this.

Darwinian Devolution

If most mutations warp or destroy what’s already in the DNA of an organism, where’s the step-by-step pathway upward to the new and improved versions?