Dorothy L. Sayers’s The Whimsical Christian
CHRISTIAN CLASSICS REVISITED
I discovered Dorothy L. Sayers’s Christian apologetics in a roundabout way. This robust Englishwoman of many and diverse talents first attracted my attention when someone forced upon me one of the Lord Peter Wimsey novels; not being a devotee of tales of detection, I was unimpressed. (I freely confess that some terrible flaw of character, or perhaps a serious malfunction of the ratiocinative segment of my brain, prevents me from relishing even the sleuthing of Chesterton’s Father Brown.) Halfway through a reading of Dante’s Divine Comedy I realized that the translator — one Dorothy L. Sayers — was the same lady who had created Lord Peter. My estimate of her rose dramatically: anyone who would lavish a labor of love upon Dante would have to be a person of elevated and sound thinking. I then happened upon several essays in literary criticism by Miss Sayers; they revealed an exceptional critic, one who discerned a reflection of the Divine Creator in man’s efforts to create. Finally I made my way to her writings on religion — Dorothy L. Sayers captured me once and for all.
In singling out one of Sayers’s works as a Christian classic one is bound to offend many of her enthusiasts, each of whom insists that his favorite is Sayers’s best book. I shall skirt this furious debate (a coward’s way out, perhaps) by choosing as my own candidate a volume of 18 essays drawn from a number of her books. The Whimsical Christian, published by Macmillan in 1978 (it appeared originally from Eerdmans in 1969 under the title Christian Letters to a Post-Christian World), includes selections from four of Sayers’s books, as well as several pieces she wrote for Punch magazine in the 1950s. This is not a mere pastiche thrown together by a publisher to cash in on a dead author’s fame. The Whimsical Christian is a classic in its own right.
One discovers in these essays a Dorothy L. Sayers at the pinnacle of her powers. All the traits that made her a master of apologetics are present: the mordant wit with which she skewered two generations of secularists; the dazzling erudition that enabled her to claim as her province the whole of Western civilization from the ancient Greeks and Hebrews to the latest findings of 20th-century science; the unerring ability to forge metaphors that suddenly illuminate a difficult topic with the light of understanding; the unwavering devotion to reason and common sense; the talent for infusing the oft-repeated (and oft-misunderstood) doctrines of the Church with a renewed vigor. The breadth and diversity of these essays do not prevent the emergence of a guiding theme: the defense of the fundamentals of the faith, both against secularists from without and lukewarm Christians from within. From first to last, from “Selections from ‘The Pantheon Papers’” — a satire on humanism (“I believe in man, maker of himself…”) — to “The Faust Legend and the Idea of the Devil” — a penetrating examination of Western man’s fascination with the Prince of the Dark Realms — The Whimsical Christian provides the unadulterated pleasure of watching the workings of a powerful Christian mind.
Enjoyed reading this?
READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY
SUBSCRIBEYou May Also Enjoy
GKC did believe creation and its Creator are good, but not that the majority of people would always choose rightly or that any merely human structure would endure.
Should we try to repair our imperfections using our human ingenuity and genius? In other words, should man aspire to control nature, to play God?
Political activists of every stripe distrust Percy, for none of them knows exactly where to peg him.