Volume > Issue > Father Figuring

Father Figuring

NEW OXFORD NOTEBOOK

By Pieter Vree | July-August 2019
Pieter Vree is Editor of the NOR.

A favored tactic of Christian fundamentalists is to cherry-pick Bible verses that, in isolation, appear to undermine or refute certain Catholic doctrines or practices in favor of a Reformation novelty. And they have been very successful over the years in drawing uncatechized or nominal Catholics out of communion with the Church of Rome and into their sects.

One of the novelties of the Reformation is “the priesthood of all believers.” Martin Luther, in his Address to the Nobility of the German Nation (1520), argued that there is no real distinction between “temporal” and “spiritual” orders — i.e., between the laity and the clergy. “Whoever comes out of the water of baptism can boast that he is already a consecrated priest, bishop, and pope,” he wrote. True Christians have no need of “the tin gods and buffoons of this world, the pope with his priests.”

The key proof text fundamentalists use to combat what they consider Catholic buffoonery is Matthew 23:9, in which Jesus says, “Call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven.” It is therefore unbiblical, fundamentalists argue, to call priests Father.

Catholic apologists have ably defended the priesthood against this charge, noting that Jesus wasn’t making a blanket statement here but was rebuking the Pharisees for being self-promoters (“they love the place of honor at feasts”) and placing onerous burdens on others, and He was using customary Hebrew hyperbole to make His point. This, however, is easily missed by fundamentalists who read the Bible exclusively in the literal sense and ignore the allegorical, moral, and anagogic senses of Scripture.

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

Desperately Jesuitical

Fr. James Keenan, S.J., is worried that the "scapegoat" for the priestly sex scandals will be "gay priests."

Reflections on the Church Hierarchy

Has there ever before been a time in Church history when moral and disciplinary laxity in the hierarchy has had to contend with a free and active press?

A “Deeper Understanding” of the Priesthood?

No temporal or civilizational events can override the sacramental necessity of the Catholic priesthood’s being reserved to men.