Is It Time to Elect Bishops Again?
GUEST COLUMN
Two developments of the past few years have caused American Catholics to focus on their largely unknown hierarchy — the televising of bishops’ meetings and the scandal of sexual abuse (by a small percentage of priests) with episcopal cover-up (by many bishops).
Thanks to television, particularly EWTN, we ordinary laity in the pews can look in on the bishops at their annual proceedings. Their names are becoming familiar and it’s not an impressive collection of shepherds. In the words of that inquiring mind, Butch Cassidy, we might dare ask, “Who are those guys?” Or, more importantly, where did they come from?
The second development — the abuse-and-cover-up scandal — makes those questions more urgent. Three years ago the panicked shepherds had to respond to the scandals and to appear, particularly to the media, to be doing something. And they did, producing the flawed Dallas Charter and appointing a National Review Board. The Dallas Charter was flawed because its focus was on the clergy and lay employees — somehow there was little mention of episcopal obstruction of justice. (One eager cardinal, oblivious to due process and concern for reputation, even released the names of all priests in his diocese ever accused of improprieties.)
How had it happened that a majority of bishops had priorities so disordered that, as summarized by the Dallas Morning News in 2002, they had sought to conceal and obstruct? Who picked them to lead the Church?
You May Also Enjoy
The new Prefect for the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith advises that homosexual priests, rather than publicly revealing their 'sexual orientation,' should stay in the closet.
Here we follow-up on some disgraced prelates and their inner circles who did the dirty work of covering fraudulent, criminal behavior.
One of the prime characteristics of the Church in our time is an almost complete absence of discipline, even in dioceses led by good bishops.