Volume > Issue > Note List > It's Time for Another Free Speech Movement

It’s Time for Another Free Speech Movement

If you’re but a creature of your times, you’re accustomed to saying “humankind” instead of mankind, “firefighter” instead of fireman, “letter carrier” instead of mailman, “businessperson” instead of businessman, etc. We believe our readers are immune from cultural conditioning and linguistic engineering, so we’re not talking about you. But pity the zombies, for there’s a lot more Newspeak for them to assimilate.

But before getting to that, something needs to be said about the avoidance of “man” in a compound word. The erudite Jacques Barzun, in his book Dawn to Decadence, explained succinctly why “man” is correct usage: “In the compounds that have been regarded as invidious — spokesman, chairman, and the like — man retains that original sense of human being, as is proved by the word woman….” Or as the whimsical Sheldon Vanauken versified in the September 1978 NEW OXFORD REVIEW:

Her unisex temper would worsen

If as chairman she wasn’t “chairperson”:

She required that we ban

Those damned suffixes, “man” —

So now she’s become a woperson.

But most people don’t understand how the English language works, and so are easy targets for the mind-controllers.

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

By the Lakes of Babylon

Fr. Hesburgh proved to be a perfect avatar for the Notre Dame he created: an endorser of some kind of vaguely conceived “natural religion.”

The Secular Mind IV: Relativism

My student was a stand-in for millions of us who have been hearing in schools and reading in newspapers that "values vary, depending on the person."

You Can Say That?

China could well be poised to inherit the earth that the U.S. once commanded — especially if our comparative student bodies are any indication.