The Common Ground Project At the End of an Era
EDITORIAL
In our last three editorials (Oct., Nov., & Dec.), we really stuck our necks out. While the response has been overwhelmingly favorable, it’s been mixed with flurries of “cancel my subscription” notes. In between those two kinds of responses have been others, several of the “wait a minute, now” variety.
The misgivings usually revolve around our critique of the Common Ground Project (recently renamed the Common Ground Initiative — but we will go with the original name here, for the sake of consistency and clarity). We received a letter from Jerome Wolbert of the Department of Mathematics at the University of Chicago which clearly captures the spirit of the misgivings. It deserves careful attention. Here is what he has to say (abridged and adapted):
“Your November editorial, ‘Rome Under Siege,’ was a skewed view of Cardinal Bernardin’s Common Ground Project, and this has been borne out by Bernardin’s replies to Cardinal Law and the others who questioned his motives.
“I realize that ‘dialogue’ is a code word which sets many minds on edge, but there needs to be a way of saying that we need to talk without saying that doctrine must change.
You May Also Enjoy
Armed with a Eurail pass, insufficient funds, inadequate French, and a prepared talk on “Christian…
Lumps, Bumps and Meditation... Playing Parents of "Gays" for Suckers... Is St. Monica Now Obsolete?... In the Name of the Father-Mother, Ron Rolheiser and the Holy Spirit... A Schism at Communio?... Psychiatric Stations of the Cross... Compassion and Psychobabble: What a Perfect Same-Sex Marriage!... Priest-Psychologist Hangs Himself
Review of I Will Never Forget You: The Rescue Movement in the Life of Joan Andrews