The Content of Their Character — Forty Years Later
GUEST COLUMN
I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.
— The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., 1963.
Don’t be judgmental.
— Liberal teachers, professors, pundits,and clergy, 2004.
The word “judgmental,” in the sense of being critical of someone’s actions or character, dates only from the 1960s. What does using this word in this sense reveal about our thinking? How does it affect our actions?
Specifically, how can we follow Dr. King’s advice, and at the same time believe it is wrong to be “judgmental”? I don’t think we can.
For a generation, we have been discarding criteria by which to judge a person’s character. We removed the Ten Commandments from schools and courthouses. We tossed out the Bible and all that goes with it. We threw away the rulebook, so we are in no position to complain when someone breaks the rules. What rules? He may have broken your rules, but he didn’t break his rules — and his rules are as valid as anyone’s, aren’t they?
But if by chance we still have a complaint, where do we direct it? We have done our best to remove God from public life. In addition to ripping up the rulebook, we turned our backs on the Referee. Instead, we have a noisy cheering section that keeps chanting, “Don’t be judgmental — who are we to judge?” Who, indeed? After all, we’re not perfect, are we?
You May Also Enjoy
Review of Race by Studs Terkel
Precedent is a major component, but the law can become confused and contradictory when an underlying moral question is ignored.
With the collapse of “Christendom” and the rise of the Third World, the Church in our day is beginning to see the Gospel apart from a European matrix.