Volume > Issue > The Hedonistic Death Drive of “Queerness”

The Hedonistic Death Drive of “Queerness”

ON CONSERVATIVES’ EMBRACE OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE

By Alexander Riley |
Alexander Riley is a Senior Fellow at the Alexander Hamilton Institute for the Study of Western Civilization and a member of the board of directors of the National Association of Scholars. His Substack newsletter can be found at alexanderriley.substack.com. All the views he expresses are his and do not represent the views of his employer.

The second election of Donald Trump to the presidency is a propitious moment to evaluate the state of conservatism in the United States. Trump was carried back into office in significant measure by a broad reaction against the perceived extremism of woke cultural politics, especially on matters related to gender and sexuality. It is, perhaps, an appropriate time to ask just how well conservatives understand the threat of the cultural Left’s attack on the traditional understanding of human sexuality.

A significant number of conservative public figures who claim opposition to the woke agenda on sexual matters give evidence of being blinded to the full danger of that radical movement. Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace, for example, is highly critical of the transgender movement, but she has made it clear that she strongly supports same-sex marriage. The writer Batya Ungar-Sargon has expressed this view as a general principle, arguing that Trump-voting conservatives distinguish what they see as the dangers of the radical sexuality movement (the “nihilistic pro-transitioning-children elite”) from the moral conservatism of a “pro-marriage, whatever your orientation side.” In this vision, the construction of a pro-homosexual Left and an anti-homosexual Right is completely distorted — or “nonsense,” as Ungar-Sargon puts it.

It has been argued instead that even the Christian portion of the American Right is fundamentally supportive of same-sex marriage and other elements of a purportedly moderate-conservative effort to recognize homosexuality as a legitimate structure for long-term relationships and social institutions.

Evidence shows that the view of same-sex marriage championed by Mace and Ungar-Sargon is much more common in conservative circles than it was only a decade ago. Recent Pew survey data reveal that nearly half of all Republicans agree that same-sex marriage is a good thing for society. There is variation within the ranks, of course. Only a third of self-described conservative (as opposed to moderate) Republicans agree, though perhaps “only” is the wrong term — it is, after all, a full one in three. Among young (age 18-29) Republicans, the situation is predictably and significantly more affirmative on same-sex marriage: nearly two-thirds of them see it as a good thing.

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

The Hedonistic Death Drive of “Queerness”

'Queerness' is more than a broad aegis under which to group everything that is not heterosexual. There is a spirit that animates the LGBTQ worldview.

Man’s Natural Aptitude for the Divine

Willa Cather, in Death Comes for the Archbishop, offers a clear literary portrait of a man who sees the divine in the ordinary.

The Conservative Surrender in the Culture Wars

The systematic protection of homosexual behavior is a consequence of an even greater lie: that there are no real differences between the sexes.