The News You May Have Missed
READ ALL ABOUT IT...
The inclusion of the song “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer” in a Christmas pageant caused a stir at a public grade school in Wilmington, North Carolina. A Jewish parent complained about the song’s “religious overtones,” and got it pulled from her child’s kindergarten Christmas show at Murrayville Elementary School. The song was ousted “because it had the word Christmas in it,” Rick Holliday, assistant school superintendent, told WRAL-TV (Dec. 9, 2008). But after carefully reviewing the lyrics of the song, school administrators and attorneys concluded that Rudolph was “a flying reindeer, not a religious symbol.”
An Austrian mayor ordered cleaners to chuck out the town hall’s eco-Christmas Nativity crib — after mistaking it for a pile of garbage. The “green” display, made from recycled materials, was meant to be an artistic criticism of the over-commercialization of the Christmas season. But Franz Dobusch, mayor of Linz, told staff to scrap it, thinking it was just a pile of old packaging and advertising brochures (Ananova, Dec. 15).
The Dutch homosexual-rights group ProGay hosted a ten-day “Pink Christmas” festival — complete with church services, homosexual movies, and a live Nativity scene featuring a plastic baby Jesus with two fathers. ProGay chairman Frank van Dalen told reporters that his group hosted the event to boost “choices for homosexual men and women” during Christmas week when they often have nothing to do. Van Dalen told the Associated Press (Dec. 21) that Christians should not take offense to the festival because it is only intended to be a “wink” at heterosexual assumptions. “Christmas is about more than religion; it’s also about love and families, not to mention shopping,” he said. “Two men or two women can form a family too these days, even one with a child.” The event was sponsored in part by the Amsterdam City Council.
Same-sex marriage supporters urged homosexuals across the U.S. to “call in gay” — to skip work — on December 10, 2008. Organizers of “Day Without a Gay,” scheduled to coincide with International Human Rights Day and modeled after similar work stoppages by Latino immigrants, also encouraged lesbians and gays to boycott shopping in order to show the impact of their absence from everyday life. After much hullabaloo and media coverage, the San Francisco Chronicle (Dec. 11) announced the protest had “fizzled” even in the Bay Area, the epicenter of “gay culture.” The reason: Gays and lesbians couldn’t afford to take a day off.
Enjoyed reading this?
READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY
SUBSCRIBEYou May Also Enjoy
Preferential Option, Berkeley-Style... Canadian Catholic Accommodationism... Jihad for the Fair Sex... Disunited Methodists... Changing Clothes... Archie, the New Gay Martyr... Canon Law: Unpopular in Rochester... Setting a Good Example?... Bad Luck, Giant Duck
The Taste of Haute Art... Cry of the City Slicker... Robot Outsourcing... Escalator Blues... Busted by Pigs... Very Wrong Number... and more
Nightmare at 20,000 Feet... Harder Than It Looks... Fun with Crystal Meth... Calling All Purple Penguins... Wasting Time at College... Loving the Christmas Creep... Bride for a Day, Groom Not Included... Three-Minute Mourning... more