The Relevance of Riches & Poverty
CHRIST & NEIGHBOR
“The Gospel seems to treat riches and poverty as irrelevant.” This is the opinion of Michael Novak, as expressed in his book The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism.
Compare this statement with the following four parables or statements of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. I give him the full title because the Gospel takes its authority from him who has the right and authority to rebuke, command, judge, punish, and reward. So what Novak means is, “Jesus Christ seems to treat riches and poverty as irrelevant.” But consider:
(1) The parable of the rich man whose barns were not big enough to hold his crops. He tore them down and built larger ones and said to his soul, “Soul, you have ample goods laid up for many years; take your ease, eat, drink, be merry.” But God said to him, “Fool! This night your soul is required of you.” And Jesus adds, “So is he who lays up treasure for himself and is not rich toward God” (Lk. 12:15-21). Riches and poverty irrelevant?
(2) The terrible story of Dives and Lazarus. Dives (Latin for “the rich one”) is what tradition has called him, but Jesus said only, “There was a rich man.” St. Gregory the Great makes the excellent point, “In common life the names of the rich are better known than those of the poor. How comes it then that when our Lord has to speak of both, he names the poor man and not the rich? The answer is that God knows and approves the humble but does not know the proud.”
You May Also Enjoy
The resistance of American workers to communist domination of their trade unions was based on something far more solid than anti-communist hysteria.
Obsession with work and “workaholism” produce dangerous effects that lead to a desensitizing, deadening, and dehumanizing of the spirit.
Michael Harrington was an eloquent, attractive leader and lucid thinker. Even those who disagreed with him found it almost impossible not to love him.