Volume > Issue > Tremors in the Foundation of the U.S. Catholic Church

Tremors in the Foundation of the U.S. Catholic Church

A PRIEST FROM ENGLAND REFLECTS

By Bernard D. Green | October 1993
The Rev. Bernard D. Green was born and raised in England, and returns there frequently. He is Associate Pastor of the Church of the Sacred Heart in Tucson, Arizona, where he also ministers to Native Americans and teaches New Testament at Pima Community Col­lege.

Thinking about the Catholic Church in the U.S., a metaphor keeps coming to mind: “We seem to be at sea.” This image conveys the sense of having lost our bearings, of having been blown off course. Vatican II charted a new course for the Church. There was excitement in the air: We were on the move and we knew where we were headed. But now, some 30 years into the journey, we seem to be “at sea” and the passengers on the Ark of Peter, notably Americans, are asking some serious questions, especially of those who are sup­posed to be crewing this ship. Read the letters in America’s Catholic newspapers. They reflect the confusion and distress of many ordinary Catholics. Above all, they seem to be saying that American Catholics do not know what they are doing or where they are going.

These questions seem to be coalescing around one central question: “What is our Catholic identity?” The issue is being raised regarding schools, hospitals, and local church life. What distinguishes being Catholic from being anything else? Do we know who we are any longer? Of particular impor­tance is the sense that the Catholic Church in the U.S. is fragmenting. I wonder: Are American Catho­lics any longer united around a fundamental set of beliefs and values such that they can recognize each other as being of the same body? Furthermore, can they recognize that body as being part of the uni­versal Catholic Church with her center in Rome?

Since I arrived in the U.S. from England in 1976, I have been a chaplain to a nursing home and a college. I have been a therapist in a rehabilitation center for priests, done parish work, taught in a seminary, traveled the country giving workshops in pastoral counseling and spiritual direction, and am currently an associate pastor in a parish in the Southwest. In trying to preach and teach the faith in all these settings, I have come up against the fact of differences. Some were not unexpected. I knew there would be legitimate cultural differences. I also expected there would be differences in religious expression, and so there were. However, what I was not prepared for was the fact that in some situa­tions I discovered that there were some Catholics I was simply unable to dialogue with. On the one hand, we could not dialogue on the basis of a com­mon tradition because there did not seem to be one; on the other hand, I could not dialogue with them as being entirely of a different faith community, because they were not that either.

This situation has important implications for our evangelization efforts. It is difficult to see how we can truly evangelize America, which is so des­perate for the witness of Christian life, if we cannot at a fundamental level speak with a united voice about the meaning and significance of our faith. At present, different groups, while acting as though they belong in the same body and speaking in its name, are operating out of radically different theo­logical assumptions and contradictory pastoral agendas; some are simply going their own way.

In what follows, I will identify what I see as — to deploy another metaphor — the fault lines in the American Church. They are like the faults in the earth’s surface: The land may look solid, but when one of the tectonic plates that make up the surface moves beneath us, we become aware that all is not well. I am beginning to see the Church in the U.S. in this way — as consisting of a series of separate theological and pastoral “plates” which simply ex­ist side by side. When they rub against one another, we experience an earthquake — and a sense of be­wilderment, even fear. What follows, then, is an in­vitation to reflect on this situation and maybe iden­tify other fault lines or offer correction to the ones I think I perceive.

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

Chastity & the Prolife Movement

The prolife movement of the 21st century must adopt chastity as the fifth pillar of advocacy for preborn children.

The Dubious Adrienne von Speyr

Perhaps tied to old memories from her pre-Catholic youth, Speyr's private revelations seem to conflict with Catholic teaching on vital points.

Letter to the Editor: April 2003

He Asks, Who is a Jew? I Ask, Who is a Catholic?... Publicists for the Bishops... Sensitive to Bigots... From Inside Sacred Heart Seminary...