Would Offensive U.S. Military Action in the Persian Gulf Be Morally Justifiable?
LETTER TO PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH
Ed. Note: The following letter, dated November 15 and written at the urging of a majority of the U. S. Catholic bishops, is presented here in abridged form.
I write as President of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops. The Catholic bishops of the United States met in our nation’s capital this week and voted to affirm and make their own the enclosed letter of Archbishop Roger Mahony sent to Secretary Baker on November 7 [see previous article].
We Catholic bishops are heirs of a long tradition of thought and moral reflection on issues of war and peace, including The Challenge of Peace, our pastoral letter of 1983. Catholic teaching reflects a strong presumption against war while admitting the moral permissibility of the use of force under certain restrictive conditions. These traditional “just war” criteria limit strictly the circumstances under which war may be morally justifiable and also govern the means by which war may be carried out. Now our Conference seeks to apply this tradition to the complex and changing situation in the Persian Gulf. While there may be diverse points of view on the specific application of these principles, our Conference finds significant consensus on four key priorities:
You May Also Enjoy
"We are stuck…in a kind of bitterness, angry with the church for not changing as we had hoped."
The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien... America’s Quest for the Ideal Self: Dissent and Fulfillment in the 60s and 70s
How refreshing it is to hear two atheist scientists call Darwin’s pet theory “utterly implausible, empty, and internally, fatally and irredeemably flawed.”